Hello,
I'm just puzzling which way to go.
At this moment I listen to a adsm/1+aeb10+a4200d (b+m)+c5100(t+st)+a 212mk1+(one!)sizmik 10.25. Silver interlinks/2xk400
My room is about 11mtr deep and the side walls are non-parallel (average about 4mtr). The speakers are located about halfway the room facing in the long way direction. The (1) subwoofer is located wright in the middle between the 212's so not close to any wall.
I can't help saying that I'm a little bit disappointed about the sound. It does not nearly coming close to the sound I loved to get from my akubarik aktiv's (located on the same place).
And finally, everything has to be compatible with a surround set up too....
What could be the problem?
1- Usage of one sub instead of two? (the sizmik does have both q L and R input so is double wired to the exaktbox.
2- Usages of so+ made some improvement but still not convincing. Should I add the subwoofer in so+ too? I thought this was not the idea when you configured the exaktbox filters already with 212+subwoofer.
3- other ideas?
It's just that I am somewhat on a "death end" with upgrading concerning my akubarik aktiv's. Upgrading the akubariks to integrated exakt is too expensive at this moment so I was looking for an Exakt alternative to my akubarik aktiv's which is more costeffective.
But as I sad, this 212/sizmik/exaktbox option doesn't confince me at all at this moment.
Any thoughts are welcome and thanks already for the respons.
Kind regards
Bart
Stereo: adsm/1, KK/1, Akubarik aktiv
Surround: added to above: Oppo 105, dune mediaplayer, 225, 212, Katan, Akurate Exaktbox 10, Majik Exaktbox, A4200, C3200, C5100, sizmik 10.25